Comunicado de prensa Beatriz (Press statement about Beatriz)

Comunicado de prensa Beatriz
(Press statement about Beatriz)

14 May 2013

A press conference was held today in El Salvador with lots of media coverage and Beatriz’s mother who requested that the supreme court allow health professionals to perform an abortion that will allow Beatriz to live.  As you may have read, Beatriz (not her real name) is 23 weeks pregnant with an anencephalic fetus and has been denied an abortion because of El Salvador’s complete restriction on abortion.

The President of the country has also just been quoted as saying that Beatriz should be able to make her own decisions about her life!  We’ll see what kind of repercussions that causes.

Sent by Charlotte Hord Smith, Ipas


   

 
COMUNICADO

A LA SOCIEDAD SALVADOREÑA
A LA SALA DE LO CONSTITUCIONAL DE LA CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA
AL PRESIDENTE DE LA REPUBLICA
AL FISCAL GENERAL DE LA REPUBLICA DE EL SALVADOR

Beatriz, joven salvadoreña de 22 años, madre de un niño de 1 año, tiene lupus eritematoso sistémico y cursa un embarazo anencefálico (sin cerebro) quien al nacer lamentablemente morirá, se enfrenta a una realidad que es difícil de creer en pleno siglo XXI, se le está negando su derecho a vivir.

Obligar a Beatriz a que lleve el embarazo a termino con una enfermedad crónica como el lupus eritematoso sistémico es ya un riesgo serio de muerte, si a esto le sumamos que el producto de la gestación es anencefálico, es decir, que no tiene cerebro, es someterla a tratos crueles e inhumanos, es someterla a tortura.  

Diferentes voces a favor de la vida de Beatriz se han pronunciado , destacando la posición de organismos responsables por el tutelaje de los Derechos Humanos a nivel nacional e internacional, como la Procuraduría para la defensa de los Derechos Humanos, Comisión Nacional de Bioética, Asociación de Ginecología y Obstetricia de El Salvador, El Ministerio de Salud de El Salvador, el Foro Nacional de Salud, algunas iglesias evangélicas, y de manera muy especial la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH), ha dictado medidas cautelares, instando al estado salvadoreño a cumplir con su deber de garantizar el derecho a la vida , asimismo han manifestado su posición en defensa de la vida de Beatriz, el Alto Comisionado de Naciones Unidas (4 relatorías especiales de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas), la Representación del Sistema de Naciones Unidas en El Salvador, Amnistía Internacional, Diputados Españoles del PSOE, Organizaciones de mujeres defensoras de derechos humanos , entre otros.


El Estado tiene la obligación de proteger la vida y la salud de sus ciudadanas, (Art. 1,65 y 66 CP), derechos humanos también reconocidos en tratados y convenios internacionales que ha firmado y ratificado, ¿Entonces cuáles son las razones que argumenta éste Estado para negar la finalización de la gestación, sobre todo en casos como el de Beatriz?

¿Qué explicaciones le dará el Estado Salvadoreño a la familia de Beatriz, a su hijo si en el peor de los casos ella fallece?

Las y los ciudadanos Salvadoreñas exigimos que la Corte Suprema de Justicia reivindique los derechos a la vida y la salud de Beatriz y que respete el derecho al ejercicio profesional de los prestadores de servicios de salud, reconocido en la legislación Salvadoreña, permitiendo la finalización de la gestación como la única alternativa médica para salvarle la vida sin ningún tipo de repercusión legal.

¡Si Beatriz fuera tu hermana, tu madre, tu esposa, tu hija, una de las mujeres más importante en tu vida! ¿Cómo actuarias? 

Ireland: ‘As a woman who has had an abortion, I feel patronised’

Women who have had abortions present their views on the debate about the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill

by Rosita Boland,  The Irish Times, May 11th 2013

Helen is in her late 40s and lives in Dublin

‘I had an abortion in my early 30s. I would have been a single self-employed parent in a small isolated community that I had recently moved to, and that would not have been the right thing for me then. It was a crisis pregnancy, but I was definitely not suicidal.

“Making the decision was ghastly and traumatic, but I did it because I knew without any doubt it was the right thing for me to do at that time. I am now in my late 40s and, 17 years on, I have never once regretted my decision.

“I think the ongoing debate about the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill is really, essentially, all about control, and trying to continue to control women’s lives.  

“The proposed change to the legislation will not make a screed of difference to the thousands of women who will travel to have abortions this year, each of them for their own private reasons. There is not just an elephant in the room, as this debate ignores the fact that there are tens of thousands of Irish women who have had abortions outside Ireland. There is an entire zoo.  

“Every time in the past few weeks that I have heard that sanctimonious expression from politicians and pundits who fear the proposed legislation will ‘open the floodgates’, I have wanted to explode. I find that particular expression deeply offensive. It’s as if women are inanimate and brainless and can’t be trusted with our own bodies and our own choices but must be restrained behind these floodgates for our own good.

“I believe that only the woman has the right to decide what happens to her body when she is pregnant. Nobody else does. Not a court of law, not a team of psychiatrists, not the politicians I never voted for and never will. It is my fundamental human right to have control over my body, my choices and my life.

“I don’t think it’s entirely the fault of the Catholic Church that abortion is such a divisive subject in Ireland. We are a society of ostriches who hate to rock the boat.

“I think it has become such a widespread societal norm in this country to consign abortion to a box labelled ‘taboo’, ‘toxic’ and ‘sinful’. From listening closely to the airwaves over the past three weeks, and reading the newspapers, I honestly don’t know how we climb out of this crater of stagnant polarising toxicity when it comes to debating changes to the abortion law in any form.  

“As for abortion becoming legal in Ireland, I cannot see that happening in my lifetime, and that makes me utterly depressed.

“As a woman who has had an abortion, I feel patronised, belittled and judged by those who believe I have committed a crime or sinned against a god I don’t believe in. I feel excluded and controlled by a society that is still trying to ignore my existence.

“I feel tainted by those who throw words like grenades at women who have had abortions: words such as ‘execution’, ‘murder’ and ‘killing’. Irish women who have had abortions are doubly invisible because not only would politicians love to think we don’t exist, but society has conspired to make us silent.  

“If I allowed my name to be published, I know it would define me for years in a negative way. I have seen it happen others. How can that be right in 2013, in a country that proudly considers itself developed and progressive, and that currently holds the presidency of the Council of European Union?”

Helen’s name has been changed.

URGENT ACTION: MORE SIGNATURES NEEDED

Beatriz still denied abortion in El Salvador

Officials say that granting a life-saving termination of an unviable foetus would be first step towards legal abortion.

Nina Lakhani 11 May 2013

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/05/2013510112715422231.html

San Salvador, El Salvador - Beatriz, a 22-year-old woman known to the world only by a single name, has a simple request.

“I want to live,” she says.

Her life hangs by a thread while the El Salvador’s Supreme Court decides whether her right to life should be protected, or whether the rights of her unborn foetus should prevail.

Beatriz is almost 23 weeks pregnant. She has lupus, an auto-immune disease which causes the body’s immune system to attack its own tissue. Her condition is deteriorating and her doctors say she is at “high risk of death” if the pregnancy continues.

Medics have recommended an abortion in order to save her life, but cannot proceed amid fear of prosecution.

Yet in this case, the foetus is unviable. Several scans have revealed that it is anencephalic - missing a large part of the brain and skull. Almost all babies with anencephaly die before birth, or within a few hours or days after birth. It has no chance of surviving into infancy, experts say.

She is currently in hospital suffering from early-stage kidney failure, caused by her lupus. With every day that passes the risk to Beatriz’s life increases, her doctors say.

But the country’s powerful religious campaigners are adamant that there be no exceptions - that the life of the foetus must be protected from the moment of conception. Public opinion is divided.

MORE SIGNATURES NEEDED:

‘Aggravated homicide’

Her medical team made an application to El Salvadorian legal authorities at the end of March, seeking permission to proceed with a therapeutic abortion in order to safeguard Beatriz’s health. They asked for a guarantee that they would not be prosecuted.

Under Article 133 of the country’s penal code, anyone who provides - or tries to access - abortion services can face lengthy prison sentences. Women and doctors can be charged with aggravated homicide.

The authorities have yet to respond to her doctors’ request.

The attorney general could use his powers to give the doctors and Beatriz protection from prosecution. He has so far refused to do so.

The country’s highest court was therefore presented with the case in mid-April. Lawyers acting for Beatriz asked the Supreme Court to guarantee legal protection for Beatriz and her doctors.

Several international bodies have also intervened.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights took the unprecedented step of ordering the El Salvadorian government to take “precautionary measures” and implement the treatment recommended by the Specialised National Maternity Hospital.

On April 29, the commission gave the government 72 hours to comply with the precautionary measures in order “to safeguard life, personal integrity and health”. It was an attempt by the commission to ensure the case was expedited by the Supreme Court.

Despite that ruling, no decision has yet been made.

“The delays are unconscionable,” Amnesty International’s Esther Major told Al Jazeera.

Last week the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court ordered a range of psychological and physical tests to be carried out on Beatriz by the Institute of Legal Medicine (ILM).

To the shock of campaigners, the ILM opinion contradicted all previous assessments and recommended Beatriz continue with the pregnancy - a “wait and see” approach.

“The opinion was completely biased,” said Sara Garcia from the Citizens’ Group for the Decriminalisation of Therapeutic, Ethical and Eugenic Abortion. ”Four of the doctors that participated had already expressed an opinion against Beatriz being allowed a therapeutic abortion.”

The ILM has publicly rejected accusations of bias, stating that its opinion was supported by various national medical organisations - including the Association of Bioethics, the Association of Rheumatology and the Association of Nephrology and Arterial Hypertension.   

 

‘Political manoeuvring’

In what appears to be Beatriz’s last chance, her lawyers submitted an application to the Supreme Court on May 8, urging them to reject the ILM opinion on the grounds of “bias and flawed process”.

“This is the end, the legal possibilities have been exhausted,” said Victor Hugo, Beatriz’s lawyer.

The case has re-ignited national and international debates about access to abortion and a woman’s right to life.

Abortion was criminalised in El Salvador in 1997 by the then-governing Nationalist Republican Alliance party. Before then, abortion in cases such as Beatriz’s would have been permitted.

Marta Maria Blandon is the regional director of the international abortion rights organisation Ipas. “It was a political manoeuvre in an electoral context, trying to secure votes from conservative groups by showing unconditional support for the Catholic Church,” she told Al Jazeera. 

“The reform to the penal code was done in secret without any public consultation.”

Since then, around 600 women have been criminally investigated. Almost 30 have been imprisoned for 30 years, many convicted of infanticide. Six women have subsequently been freed following campaigns by the Citizens’ Group for the Decriminalisation of Therapeutic, Ethical and Eugenic Abortion.

Activists, rights groups, academics and clinicians - including the United Nations representative in El Salvador and UN experts on the rights to health, torture, violence and discrimination against women - are among those urging authorities to grant Beatriz the right to a termination in order to save her life. Amnesty International has launched an online appeal for people to write to Luiz Martinez, the country’s attorney general.

They argue that the failure of the state to act amounts to cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment.

El Salvador’s Minister of Health, Maria Isabel Rodriguez, and her legal adviser have also written to the Supreme Court supporting the medical and constitutional basis of Beatriz’s case.

Rodriguez is the only government minister so far to speak out in support of Beatriz’s right to life - and has also criticised the IML medical opinion as flawed.

In contrast, the “Sí a la Vida” [“Yes to Life”] Foundation, an anti-abortion religious group, says feminist groups are exploiting and manipulating Beatriz in order to legalise abortion.

In a recent statement of support for anti-abortion groups, El Salvador’s Conference of Catholic Bishops said protecting the unborn child “does not constitute a violation” of Beatriz’s constitutional rights.

A global issue

Parallels are being drawn between this case and the death of Savita Halappanavar in Ireland in October 2012.

Halappanavar, an Indian dentist working in Ireland, was denied a potentially life-saving emergency abortion despite the fact she had suffered a miscarriage - because the foetus’ heart was still faintly beating.

In Ireland, the Catholic Church is vehemently opposing a new parliamentary bill to relax the strict laws and allow abortion to save a mother’s life.

Latin America hosts some of the world’s most restrictive abortion laws. In many countries, abortion is permitted only to save the woman’s life, but in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Chile, abortion is prohibited under all circumstances.

Yet the region also has some of the world’s highest rates of abortion, due to the significant unmet need for contraceptives which causes high rates of unplanned pregnancies, according to IPAS.

“We are horrified that government officials in El Salvador are standing by, watching Beatriz suffer pain and anguish, and maybe even die. It is utterly inexcusable of them to deny her life-saving treatment,” said Esther Major, Amnesty International’s El Salvadorian expert.

“Each official and judge who does not do what they can to save her, or prevent her suffering severe health damage, risks having blood on their hands. It is a human rights scandal, and one which has discrimination at its heart. Beatriz is poor, and needs treatment only women and girls need.”

Beatriz’s identity has been hidden amid enormous stigma and strong, divided opinions about her case. But on Sunday May 5, she recorded a plea to the country’s president.

“President Mauricio Funes Cartagena, help me please,” she said.

“This baby inside me cannot survive. I am ill. I want to live… I want to live for my son.”

 

TAKE ACTION:

AMNESTY International USA have launched an online action open to activists of any country: please also take this action in order to generate an additional source of immediate pressure:

http://takeaction.amnestyusa.org/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?c=6oJCLQPAJiJUG&b=6645049&aid=519715

Please write immediately in Spanish or your own language:

  • Urging the authorities to comply immediately with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights instruction of 29 April and provide Beatriz with the necessary medical treatment, in accordance with her wishes and as recommended by her doctors, in order to save her life;
  • Urging them to ensure immediately that health professionals are able to give Beatriz the treatment she needs, without any risk of criminal prosecution;
  • Urging them to decriminalise abortion in all circumstances and ensure women and girls have safe and legal access to abortion services necessary to preserve their life or health, or if they are pregnant as a result of rape.

 

PLEASE SEND APPEALS BEFORE 05 JUNE 2013 TO:

 

President
Mauricio Funes
Presidente de la República de El Salvador  
Alameda Dr. Manuel Enrique Araujo, No. 5500,
San Salvador, El Salvador
Fax +503 2243 6860 
Salutation: Dear President/
Estimado Sr. Presidente

 

Attorney General
Luís Martínez 
Fiscal General de la República 
Fiscalía General de la República
Calle Cortez Blanco Poniente, #20, Urbanización Madre Selva 3, Antiguo Cuscatlán, La Libertad.
San Salvador, El Salvador
Fax: +503 2246  4950
Email: fiscalgeneral@fgr.gob.sv 
Salutation: Dear Attorney General/ Estimado Sr. Fiscal

 

And copies to:

NGO
The Citizens’ Group for the Decriminalisation of Therapeutic, Ethical and Eugenic Abortion
Fax: +503 2226 0356 (say “tono de fax”)
Email: agrupacionporladespenalizacion@gmail.com 

 

Also send copies to diplomatic representatives accredited to your country.

Note of clarification

Note of clarification  

re: Invitation

to participants at:

First Global Conference on Contraception, Reproductive and Sexual Health
Copenhagen, Denmark, 22-25 May 2013

International Campaign for Women’s Right to Safe Abortion:  

the first year and the future

23 May,  Room 179,  1st floor

18:00-19:00 pm

Please note that the invitation to this workshop is

only for people who are attending the conference.

We apologise that we cannot support anyone’s attendance at the conference.

For information about the Campaign:

safeabortionwomensright@icma.md

Women Deliver invitation

Calling on all supporters of the

International Campaign for Women’s Right to Safe Abortion

who are attending Women Deliver!

 

You are invited to get together with colleagues from your region to discuss the Campaign and abortion rights advocacy activities for 2013, particularly to develop and share plans for 28 September 2013.

The meetings will be informal breakfast or lunch meetings − organised by region.

Once we have an idea of how many people want to meet, we will consult on best times and locations to meeting as the WD agenda is very full.

 

Let’s meet and jump start the 2013 Campaign!!

If you are already attending Women Deliver

and you wish to attend one of the regional meetings listed below,

please contact the following (put Women Deliver in the subject heading):

 

Africa region (WGNRR/Pathfinder) - dada@wgnrr.org

Eastern Europe region (ASTRA) - info@astra.org.pl

Asia region (ASAP) - kriznan.shweta@gmail.com

 

We apologise that we cannot support anyone’s attendance at the conference.

For information about the Campaign:

safeabortionwomensright@icma.md

 

Invitation

to participants at:

Women Deliver

Kuala Lumpur, 28-30 May 2013

 

International Campaign for Women’s Right to Safe Abortion